Page 16, 10th October 2008

10th October 2008
Page 16
Page 16, 10th October 2008 — Fr Ronald Rolheiser The Last Word

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Locations: Reading


Related articles

Detecting The Finger Of God In Our Lives

Page 14 from 18th July 2003

Knowing The Lord Through Experience

Page 12 from 20th July 2001

Hands Of Father Ron

Page 7 from 1st October 1999

Lionel Fanthorpe Birds And Animals Of The Bible...

Page 6 from 11th October 1991

Fr Ronald Rolheiser The Last Word

Reading the signs of the times

There is a story told about the Russian poet Anna Alc.hmatova. During the Stalinist purges she was standing one morning outside a prison along with some other women, all of whom were trying to deliver letters and packages to their loved ones inside. Their waiting was made more painful because they were not even sure whether their loved ones were still alive and by the fact that the guards made them wait needlessly for hours simply to assert their authority. But, if they wanted to get messages to their loved ones, they had no other option but to wait.

On this particular morning, another woman recognised the poet, approached her, and asked: "Can you describe this'?" Aldunatova replied: "I can", and a smile passed between the two women.

What had happened? Why did these women, caught up in the madness of a dictator, exchange a smile? Because to describe something, to simply name something properly, in some way already sets you above it. To name something is to be somehow transcendent to it, not fully imprisoned by it, free of it in some way, even if, like Stalin, it has you under its yoke. To name something properly can be prophetic, a defiant act, an act of freedom. Indeed that is what prophets do. They don't foretell the future, they name the present properly, often times in a way that exposes its faithlessness and injustice.

Nearly 15 years ago David Tracy wrote a book entitled On Naming the Present Moment. In it, with an objectivity that most of us can only envy. he tried to name, philosophically, the present moment within secular culture so as to highlight what is best both inside of liberal and conservative biases. His essay was hope-filled and gave us direction in the same way that a trip to a good doctor gives us hope and direction concerning our health. Good diagnostics are the prerequisite for good prescription, just as bad diagnostics, bad naming, leads to either bad or useless prescription. Today, both in the Church and in the world, there is. I feel, a lot of sloppy naming. We need, both for better diagnostics and better prophecy, to name our present faith moment more accurately. A symptom suffers most when it doesn't know where it belongs.

But there is more. To name something properly is also a form of prayer. Jesus called this, "reading the signs of the times". What does he mean by that expression'? What Jesus had in mind was not so much that we should try to attune ourselves intellectually to all the cultural, psychological and religious trends of our time. To read the signs of the times, for Jesus, meant trying to read what is happening in our lives, communally and individually, in such a way as to discern the finger of God inside the outer movements of our lives. My parents called this trying to see "divine providence": namely, trying to hear what God is saying inside the outer events of our lives.

There is a rich biblical background to this Indeed, in many ways this is central to the faith of Israel in the Jewish scriptures. For them, nothing happened that was purely an accident. God's finger was always inside of every event, no matter how secular or accidental it seemed, and the task of faith was to try to read what God was saying inside every event. For example, if Israel lost a war it wasn't because the other army had superior soldiers. It was because God was trying to teach her something, there was something she was supposed to learn from this defeat. Likewise, if there was a drought it wasn't because there was global warming, it was because, for reasons Israel had to try to discern. God wanted her to live on less that year. For her, nothing was purely accidental. God's finger was somewhere inside every event, signalling to her.

James Mackey once defined divine providence as a conspiracy of accidents through which God speaks. That runs close to what John of the Cross meant when he said that the language of God is the experience that God writes into our lives. Our task is to read that language, and we read it when we properly name the events of our lives. A proper naming does three things. It is prophetic, it names our faith and our faithlessness, our justice and our injustice; it is diagnostic, it points to the correct prescription to help remedy our ills; and, most importantly, it is a form of prayer, it tries to hear what God is saying inside the outer events of our lives.

Today we tend to name things too much according to our particular ideology, liberal or conservative. This is true both in politics and in the Church. The challenge is to be more careful and especially more prayerful. Not everything can be fixed or cured, but it should be named properly.

blog comments powered by Disqus