Page 4, 11th February 2005

11th February 2005
Page 4
Page 4, 11th February 2005 — Cardinal too old to vote in next conclave
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Curia, College of Cardinals

Share


Related articles

Cardinals May Elect An Outsider Of No Experience As The...

Page 3 from 18th August 1978

Red Faces

Page 11 from 11th February 2005

An Account Of How Cardinals Voted

Page 1 from 15th September 1978

Revising Structure Of' Church

Page 1 from 27th November 1970

The Conclave To Elect A New Pope Will Open On June 19

Page 13 from 7th June 1963

Cardinal too old to vote in next conclave

VATICAN officials have revealed that a Polish cardinal is ineligible to vote in a papal election, despite Church documents listing his age as 76, four years younger than the voting age limit. Cardinal Henryk Gulbinowicz, the former Archbishop of Wroclaw, is in fact 81.

And last week the oldest member of the College of Cardinals, Corrado Bafile, died on February 3 at the age of 101.

Cardinal Gulbinowicz is listed in Annuario Pontifico, the official Vatican yearbook, as having been born in 1928. But a member of the Curia has revealed that the Polish cardinal was actually born five years earlier in 1923.

The unnamed official said that the Curia was aware of the discrepancy between his real and listed age, and that this was not a cause for concern. “The Cardinal surely will not enter the conclave” when Pope John Paul II dies, the official said. He added that Cardinal Gulbinowicz would be far too honest to try to participate in a papal election under false pretences, adding that “there are indications” the Vatican has reached a tacit agreement with Cardinal Gulbinowicz on the question.

The official explained that the Cardinal’s date of birth had been altered by his parents in order to render him ineligible for Russian military service. Lithuania, where his family lived, was annexed by the Soviet Union in 1944.

Editorial comment: Page 11




blog comments powered by Disqus