Page 6, 11th November 1938

11th November 1938
Page 6
Page 6, 11th November 1938 — IMPRIMATUR AND THE CLERGY
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Surrey

Share


Related articles

Catholic Publisher Discusses Church Censorship

Page 7 from 21st October 1938

Refusal Of Imprimatur

Page 6 from 28th October 1938

The Children Of Beauraing

Page 2 from 2nd October 1953

New Censorship Rules

Page 3 from 18th April 1975

Here's The Answer

Page 4 from 4th January 1957

IMPRIMATUR AND THE CLERGY

SIR,—In a recent article Mr. Gwynn wrote that a priest was always obliged to have an imprimatur to whatever book he wished to,publish. This is not so. He is subject to the ordinary rules for the preliminary examination of books. What he is bound beyond that to do is to ask leave of his bishop (of his superior, if he is a religious), to publish any kind of book, " in obsequium," as a sign of respectful submission.

The rules for the prohibition of books are often spoken of as the " Index." For example, it is asked, " Does the Index bind?" The question should be " Do the rules for the prohibition of books bind?" The Index is a list, published quite rarely, of condemned books. A book is on the Index because it is condemned, not vice versa. If my memory does not play me false, the last edition of the Index was about ten years ago. Perhaps there was a reprint in 1933.

EDWARD FENNESSY (REV.). St. Edward's, Sutton Park, Guildford, Surrey.




blog comments powered by Disqus