Page 3, 12th June 1987

12th June 1987
Page 3
Page 3, 12th June 1987 — Abortion ruling attacked
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: High Court
People: Coote

Share


Related articles

Abortion Straight Forward Issue

Page 4 from 19th June 1987

Court Sterilisation Ruling 'disgraceful

Page 1 from 20th March 1987

On Level Thinking

Page 4 from 3rd July 1987

Sterilisation Ruling

Page 1 from 3rd April 1987

Ruling: Society's "indictment"

Page 1 from 8th May 1987

Abortion ruling attacked

NICHOLAS Coote, Assistant General Secretary to the, Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, attacked last weeks High Court decision to permit a mentally handicapped woman to have an abortion, saying "this is not a medical question. It's an ethical question".

Mr Coote told the Catholic Herald: "These issues have been wrongly worded in medical terms. It's simply more convenient for everyone all round for the woman to have an abortion, but the judgement completely disregards the need of the child".

The High Court ruled that the women, who is 25 but has a mental age of just three and a half, was unable to give an informed consent for the operation.

However, Mr Coote claimed that the decision was vague, as it used terminology like "substantial risk" (of the fetus being affected by Down's syndrome), which, he said, did not help in addressing the ethical issues involved.

"This is the third recent case of this kind", he said, "and is in keeping with the drift of the others in trying to make the case into one of 'clinical judgement'. It should not only be a clinical or medical judgement, but an ethical one, too".




blog comments powered by Disqus