Page 2, 14th February 1969

14th February 1969
Page 2
Page 2, 14th February 1969 — BISHOPS SPLIT OVER SPAIN'S `EMERGENCY'
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Madrid

Share


Related articles

Bishop Of Gerona Speaks " Why The Church Is With Franco "

Page 9 from 10th March 1939

Franco Warns Church Critics

Page 2 from 5th November 1971

Bilbao Bishop Wins Fight To Stay

Page 1 from 15th March 1974

Andorra Was Offered To Spain —says Franco

Page 5 from 13th June 1947

1-1c?cof Freer Church In Spain Under New Concordat

Page 9 from 12th December 1969

BISHOPS SPLIT OVER SPAIN'S `EMERGENCY'

BY A SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

Astatement supporting General Franco's state of emergency issued on behalf of the Spanish Bishops' Conference has been disowned by six bishops in southern Spain. The statement praised the government's "conservation of peace and public order".

In Madrid, Spain's new primate, Archbishop Enrique y Tarancon, said that students had a right to take part in politics.

The cabinet of Gen. Franco imposed the "state of emergency" last month for three months, saying it was needed to counter a conspiracy to "plunge the country into a wave of confusion and subversion."

Some bishops opposed such measures. Bishop Jacinto Argaya Goicoechea of San Sebastian, in the province of Guipuzcoa, which has been under a state of siege twice in recent months after a wave of violence by Basque separatists, told authorities that individual freedoms should be restored because the province had returned to "normal order and work."

In the north also, Bishop Arturo Tabera of Pamplona was reported ready to release a letter of protest against the state of emergency. Priests and laymen in Madrid and other cities demonstrated against the suspension of civil guarantees.

The joint statement, issued now by the permanent committee of the Bishops' Conference, makes it clear that the

majority of the Bishops feel that the common good is best served by the emergency moves.

"The bishops agree in solidarity with those citizens who consider the preservation of peace and public order as the basic grounds for the subsequent enjoyment of legitimate freedoms," the statement read.

"Civil authorities have thought it necessary, within the present juridical framework, to impose a temporary restriction on the exercise of certain rights, in order to safeguard the common good," the bishops stated.

The bishops stressed, however, these conditions for their support: That the state of siege be "within the measure of just defence."

That freedoms be restored as soon as the causes for the measures change.

That in the meantime there be a continued efficient effort to use "those tools designed to foster economic and social progress of the people."

"Only within an order legally established, and respected by all, can the exercise of rights and freedoms be possible," the bishops said.




blog comments powered by Disqus