Page 4, 16th January 1987

16th January 1987
Page 4
Page 4, 16th January 1987 — Misnomer and skirting the issue
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Corpus Christi Church

Share


Related articles

Former Vicar To Be Ordained Catholic Bishop

Page 1 from 10th January 2003

The Pros And Cons Of Anglican Ordinations

Page 6 from 5th July 1968

Rd Mover - Reordallial .

Page 1 from 19th December 1986

A Year Of Unity And Division

Page 4 from 20th December 1985

Anglican-methodist Unity Break-through

Page 1 from 9th February 1968

Misnomer and skirting the issue

YOUR two issues (December 19, January 2) both dealt on their front pages, in high profile, with Catholic ordination of former Anglicans. The first was entitled "Oxford mover ordained". It spoke of Peter Cornwell "seeking reordination", supported by the Archbishop of Birmingham. It spoke of Fr Charles Smith as being "Reordained on Sunday" (December 14) and as having "concelebrated his first Mass" — which is a contradiction.

The second again described Fr Charles Smith as "Reordained" when narrating that Rev John Hay saw his Bishop of Birmingham to announce his conversion to Catholicism, supposedly for three negative reasons — objections to women priests, the 1980 Alternative Service Book and Bishop David

None of this faces the issue properly — are such men reordained or ordained anew? The spirit of Apostolicae Curae (1896) underwrites the latter, and Rome has never withdrawn it; the spirit of the Second Agreed Statement of ARCIC I (1973) underwrites the former, but neither Rome nor Canterbury/Lambeth have adopted it. As it stands, there is surely no reordination present.

What was understood on the evening of December 14? I was present and can offer a view. The front two rows of Corpus Christi Church (called "Christ the King" by the presiding bishop) were filled with Anglican colleagues and friends of Charles Smith from his long years of ministry with them up to his recent retirement at 70, all of them dressed in their most solemn liturgical clothes and many having travelled from London.

Neither ordainer nor ordinand properly welcomed them, nor explained the complex condition of this conferred sacrament.

At the end, in an extraliturgical speech aftrer clapping, Fr Charles Smith did refer to those "friends from my former work". I know from them how sad it sounded to Anglicans and ecumenists alike. Eirenic words are being used to side-step the subject, by journalists in ignorance, by churchmen in . . . What should be my next word?

Alberic Stacpoole OSB *RE the news item (December 19) "Oxford mover reordained".

I take issue with the word reordained, this seems to give the impression that the Anglican ordination of these men was somehow valid. The letter Apostolicae Curae has not yet been revoked and to tacitly report matters as if it no longer had any authority is merely fudging the issue.

York Peter Grey




blog comments powered by Disqus