Page 9, 16th June 2000

16th June 2000
Page 9
Page 9, 16th June 2000 — `Vicar of Christ' an unfortunate development?
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

The Bishops As 'vicars And Legates' Of Christ

Page 7 from 2nd June 2000

Doubts

Page 10 from 26th May 2000

From Bishop Hugh Lindsay Sir, I Have Not Yet Seen

Page 9 from 26th September 2003

The Ceremony

Page 1 from 10th March 1939

Bishop's Stand Against Spread Of Unorthodoxy

Page 5 from 28th May 1971

`Vicar of Christ' an unfortunate development?

From James Radcliffe Sir, Bishop Hugh Lindsay's remarks concerning the title "Vicar of Christ" are interesting.

It was first used by Pope Innocent III. In the process of assuming the title he saw fit to repudiate the more ancient title of "Vicar of Saint Peter": "We are the successor of the Prince of the Apostles, but we are not his vicar, nor the vicar of any man or apostle, but the vicar of Jesus Christ himself'. It has been said that this was an unfortunate development. It would seem that the Pope was effectively proclaiming his refusal to be a mere link in a tradition. and his intention of being a power in his own right.

Yours faithfully, JAMES LOUIS RADCLIFFE Hitchin SG4 9QR




blog comments powered by Disqus