Page 1, 17th December 1999

17th December 1999
Page 1
Page 1, 17th December 1999 — MP's bid to end NHS euthanasia
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Church Launches Struggle To Kill Off Euthanasia Bill

Page 1 from 28th February 2003

Back My Bill, Says Winterton

Page 2 from 25th December 1999

Bma Urges Change In Euthanasia Law

Page 2 from 16th November 2001

Mps To Defy Courts Over Rulings On Euthanasia

Page 3 from 20th October 2000

Archbishop Smith Gets Tough In Fight Against Living Wills...

Page 2 from 23rd July 2004

MP's bid to end NHS euthanasia

By Simon Caldwell

A MOVE to outlaw involuntary euthanasia this week received the overwhelming support of Britain's medical ethics groups.

Right to Life, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, Alert, Care, the Guild of Catholic Doctors, SOS-NHS Patients in Danger, First Do No Harm and the Medical Ethics Alliance united to back the Private Member's Bill introduced by Ann Winterton MP into the House of Commons on Wednesday.

The Bill aims to reinforce the laws prohibiting euthanasia, which many doctors, nurses and families allege is being increasingly practiced in National Health Service hospitals since the Bland Judgment in 1993 allowed doctors to withdraw food and fluids from some vegetative patients with the permission of the courts.

The groups are also alarmed at new British Medical Association guidelines which recommend that life-ending decisions of all patients, even those not dying, are made by just two doctors and not by the High Court.

The police are investigating some 60 complaints from doctors, nurses and bereaved relatives — though Health Minister John Hutton insists patients have not been killed while in the care of the NHS. Julia Quenzler of SOS-NHS has since accused the Mr Hutton of interference in the process of justice by taking such a position. She believes the Government is nervous of a single case opening floodgates to "hundreds" of others.

She said: "For the Government to pre judge the police and Crown Prosecution Service investigations smacks of undue influence and is clearly prejudicial against those seeking justice.

"This is an irresponsible and dangerous position for the Government to adopt because it gives a green light for criminal activity and fails to protect our most vulnerable citizens."

The groups are urging their supporters to write to their MPs and are planning a mass lobby of Parliament in the New Year. The Bill, which has cross-party support but not that of the Government, will receive its second reading on January 28.

Mrs Winterton said: "There is a high level of concern being expressed at the treatment of the elderly and the vulnerable. My Bill will address that problem.

"I have no doubt I have a great deal of support in the Commons, in the Lords and in the country."

Central to the debate will be the claim by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine, and the BMA, the doctors' union, that the starving and dehydrating of patients to death does not constitute euthanasia.

MPs, pressure groups and the Church, however, say it is euthanasia by omission and claim the guidelines, called Withholding and Withdrawing Medical Treatment, have the aim of protecting doctors who have killed from prosecution because euthanasia is illegal.

The guidelines, though hiot legally binding, provide protection because doctors are unlikely to be punished by the courts if they carefully abide by the advice of their union.

Dr Tony Cole of the Medical Ethics Alliance, a group made up of 6,000 doctors opposed to euthanasia, told a Commons meeting this week that the BMA hoped to establish legal euthanasia around a "body of practice".

He said: "The BMA is clearly concerned that doctors may be criticised and wish to protect doctors and through a code, influence the courts."




blog comments powered by Disqus