Page 2, 18th September 1964

18th September 1964
Page 2
Page 2, 18th September 1964 — CANONISATION ANOMALIES
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Suenens'

Page 2 from 27th November 1964

Cardinal &twos—pilgrim Of Unity

Page 3 from 23rd October 1970

Salvadorans' Own Saints

Page 10 from 2nd November 1990

Pope Canonises Mother Elizabeth Seton

Page 1 from 19th September 1975

Canonisation Of Blessed Ogilvie

Page 1 from 7th May 1976

CANONISATION ANOMALIES

WINDING up the discussions on Chapter 7. Cardinal Suenens said that canonisation. which establishes officially recognised examples of sanctity in the Church, should be for all categories, all nations and for all social classes.

He pointed out that since the eighth century. when the present methods of canonisation began, b5 per cent of all those canonised came from religious congregations. Thirteen European nations between them accounted for 90 per cent of all canonisations.

He said the canonisation procedures were too slow and that canonisation lost its effectiveness if it were delayed for 50 or 80 years after the person was dead.

The procedure was too burdensome and too expensive. And in the case of laymen there was no organisation to promote the cause or pay the bill.

He proposed that applications should be left to national conferences of bishops working through a special commission. The beati would be in the calendar for particular countries and canonisation should be appropriate only for those who were internationally famous and should be reserved for the Pope,




blog comments powered by Disqus