Page 1, 19th February 1965

19th February 1965
Page 1
Page 1, 19th February 1965 — Advice to Government
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: British Government
People: Whelan
Locations: Durban, Bloemfontein

Share


Related articles

Thatcher's Claims

Page 2 from 8th August 1986

Our Vested Interest In Apartheid

Page 3 from 8th July 1977

Withdraw From South Africa Call

Page 3 from 25th June 1982

Howe Rejects Hurley's Plea

Page 1 from 27th May 1988

Us Bishops Step Up Pressure On Reagan

Page 1 from 20th September 1985

Advice to Government

Instead, it suggests that the British Government should adopt a policy that would include such measures as: (1) Prohibiting the export of all weapons to South Africa. (2) Ending the advantages of Commonwealth preference for South Africa and requiring immigrants from there to have a visa. (3) Reviewing new capital investment in South Africa, and if necessary preventing it. (4) Placing a surtax on dividends from South Africa to provide a fund for the relief of apartheid victims. (5) Discouraging emigration by imposing an "apartheid tax" on travel tickets and by limiting the money an emigrant

eau take with him to £10. (6) Urging other governments to refuse to export arms to South Africa.

And the report asks British Churches to strengthen their contacts with South African Churches, to increase financial relief to apartheid victims and to pray for and with South Africans "It is, however, upon Christians in South Africa that the main responsibility rests".

The most outspoken comment came from Archbishop Hurley of Durban, who is acknowledged as the leading Christian churchman in the campaign to end the evils of apartheid.

He described the report as ''an excellent document inasmuch as it assembles in most convenient form a great number of facts and significant comment concerning the South African scene."

He added: "It must also be commended for facing bravely to the ' question of economic sanctions ' both in regard to practical issues and to Christian judgment on them".

But he continued, "I would say that its suggestions regarding sanctions are weak. It endeavours to find an intermediate position between what it calls approving of apartheid in practice and waging all-out economic war against it.

"Economic sanctions, like any war, are an all or nothing affair. Either you go in wholeheartedly with a simple clear-cut issue before you, with a compelling cause and a certain amount of passion, or you refrain entirely. I cannot see how the intermediate position of the report can have any practical value. But this in no way detracts from m appreciation of it as an excellenty factual summary of the South African situation."

Archbishop Whelan of Bloemfontein. who is regarded as conservative on the apartheid issue, declined comment saying: "Although much has been pub

Continued on Back Page, Col. 5




blog comments powered by Disqus