Page 5, 19th February 1971

19th February 1971
Page 5
Page 5, 19th February 1971 — Right to private property
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Two Simple Questions

Page 5 from 19th March 1971

Week By Week

Page 2 from 8th October 1937

Short

Page 2 from 25th September 1942

Week By Week

Page 8 from 1st October 1937

A.b.c. For Catholic Politicians Snt, — As A Student Of

Page 2 from 25th April 1947

Right to private property

SO in the Gospel according ho John Desmond Sheridan (January 29) the right to private property is part of the natural law and older than Aristotle, as well as .being enshrined in two of the Ten Commandments.

Seemingly the early Christians were unaware of this striking fact: or being aware, decided to ignore it. For in Acts 4 : 32-35, we read: Now the nutltitude of believers were of one heart and one soul and not one of them said that anything he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common. And with great power the Apostles gave testimony to the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Our Lord: and great grace was in them all.

Nor was there anyone among them in want. For those who owned lands or houses would sell them and bring the price of what they sold and lay it at the feet of the Apostles, and distribution was made to each according as anyone had need.

One can forgive these primitive people their ignorance of Aristotle, John Desmond Sherickm, and the natural law. But what about those two Commandments forbidding theft and covetousness? Did they not see the right to private property enshrined therein? Evidently not. Perhaps Communists were at work among them? That principle To each, according as anyone had need is sufficiently Marxian to sug

gest it. Gabriel Fallon Dublin, 9.

We regret that because of the large number of letters received for this page we cannot acknowledge them individually.




blog comments powered by Disqus