Page 11, 19th January 2007

19th January 2007
Page 11
Page 11, 19th January 2007 — Putting home improvements before children
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Friendly Society
People: Tony Bond

Share


Related articles

God's Providence Is Not A Blank Cheque

Page 11 from 26th January 2007

Difficulties About The Theory Of Transubstantiation Can...

Page 11 from 3rd November 2006

Fleeing From Debate

Page 11 from 6th October 2006

Roll To Your Musket

Page 11 from 16th June 2006

From Miss Julia Ross Williamson

Page 11 from 7th April 2006

Putting home improvements before children

Keywords: Kesgrave, Marriage, Bond

From Mr Tony Bond SIR — It was sad to see that even Quentin de la Becloyere (Charterhouse, January 5), whose commentaries could be relied on for common sense and rigorous Catholicity, appears to have swallowed uncritically a Friendly Society's calculation that it costs £180,000 to raise a child to maturity, from which he expresses understanding of couples who defer marriage, strive for small families, need two incomes to finance an average £200,000 house and, even more surprisingly, questions whether the previous call on "our people [to] be open to life and [to] welcome the large family... is likely to make sense now".

What if it cost a million pounds to raise a child, or any other fear-inducing figure generated by the population control lobby, or others, for their own purposes? Do we then stop having children and buying houses? Materialistic considerations should not matter to people whose faith enjoins them to put out into the deep, trusting in God: "seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well".

We should do what is right without counting the cost.

Besides, a recent Daily Telegraph study found that "the affordability barometer, in which 100 points represents the average expense of house prices since the early 1960s, is now at 94.3 points"; therefore, houses are now only 5.7 per cent less affordable than in the 1960s, a modest differential hardly necessitating two incomes to fund a mortgage, defer children or limit family size.

Yours faithfully, TONY BOND Kesgrave, Suffolk




blog comments powered by Disqus