Page 5, 21st July 1967

21st July 1967
Page 5
Page 5, 21st July 1967 — Wrong about 'Lefty'
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Surrey

Share


Related articles

Albrow And The Priests On The Pyre

Page 5 from 3rd January 1969

Albrow, Foot And The Pulpit

Page 4 from 30th April 1993

Cardinal And The 'times

Page 5 from 14th February 1969

A Book That Had No Ending

Page 4 from 12th January 1968

One More Unjustified Kick In The

Page 4 from 17th January 1992

Wrong about 'Lefty'

1CANNOT understand -I-Desmond Albrow's objection (July 14) to "Lefty" as a shorthand label for the trendy progressive protester. Mr. Albrow thinks it a "perjorative [sic] Americanism, with the loaded overtones of Communism . . . out of place when discussing dear old British socialism and Socialists."

That the word, like many of the more vivid expressions in current British use, is originally an Americanism I can well believe. It would certainly he out of place if applied to ordinary democratic Socialists, but I was not talking about them. My target was those who could indeed be associated with Communism. About them I will go on being as pejorative as I can.

Kingsley Amis Maida Vale I DON'T think what I said -5about the power of the Left to be exaggerated. On the contrary, I didn't go far enough.

And I remain unrepentant about the use of the word "Lefty". It certainly does mean someone who always places the interests of the USSR first. How many of those who protest against American intervention in Vietnam also protest against the subjugation of Eastern Europe and the Baltic States?

The corresponding expression to "Lefty" is, incidentally, "Fascist". "Righty" carries no overtones of any kind, which is, I think, extremely significant.

John Braine Woking, Surrey.




blog comments powered by Disqus