Page 5, 21st March 1969

21st March 1969
Page 5
Page 5, 21st March 1969 — Humanists reply
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

People: Michael Lines
Locations: London

Share


Related articles

Where Christians & Humanists Can Work Together

Page 4 from 7th March 1969

Warning On Humanist Hostility

Page 10 from 27th January 1967

Religious Education In Schools Humanist Plot

Page 7 from 19th March 1976

Religious Education In Schools Humanist Plot

Page 5 from 19th March 1976

Humanist Debate

Page 5 from 12th October 1973

Humanists reply

SINCE you quote Cardinal Heenan as saying that "the Humanists are battling with growing success to convince the public that religion should he banished from state schools," will you allow me to correct this statement?

Humanists are not philistines; they want children to know about the Christian religion and other religions and ways of life which are part of our cultural heritage. They therefore want the state schools to work out new ways of teaching about these subjects, and they think that the compulsion to teach "agreed syllabuses" which the 1944 Education Act laid on these schools stands in the way of an honest development desired by many teachers.

Many Christians, as well as Jews and humanists, are concerned about the falsification and pretence that the present compulsion entails, and are working together in the Campaign for Moral Education to provide a better basis for both moral and religious education.

The British Humanist Association has repeatedly made it plain in publications and in the Press that it does not wish to dismiss religion from the schools; is it too much to hope that ?Ms-statements about our intentions should now cease?

Michael Lines, General Secretary British Humanist Association, London, W.8,




blog comments powered by Disqus