Page 7, 22nd February 2002

22nd February 2002
Page 7
Page 7, 22nd February 2002 — From Mr Paul Crawley Sir. Gerard Noel is a constant and, to my mind, unjust critic of Pius XII.
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Pius Xii And The Jews: The True Reason For Silence

Page 7 from 22nd March 2002

From Dr Michael Straiton

Page 7 from 22nd February 2002

Defending Pius Xii Against 'unjust' Critics

Page 7 from 22nd February 2002

Pius Xii: The Great Pacelli Or Hitler's Pope?

Page 7 from 8th October 1999

From Mr Sean O'connor Sir — I Was Astonished To

Page 11 from 22nd August 2008

From Mr Paul Crawley Sir. Gerard Noel is a constant and, to my mind, unjust critic of Pius XII.

He holds up Pius VII as a hero of the "anti-Napoleonic resistance", apparently because the supreme pontiff provoked Bonaparte into arresting him. This tactic caused the Emperor to lose face, since he had to release the Pope ere he died in captivity. Noel thinks that his successor should have faced up to Hitler in the same way. That is to ignore the fact that Napoleon was a far better man than Hitler.

Not only would the Nazis have arrested Pius, and probably assassinated him in secret, but also all the Jews who were sheltering on Church premises, under the Pope's protection.

Pius's apparent non-resistance to absolute evil may have been enjoined by the Holy Spirit. Christ answered Caiaphas and Pilate yet remained silent before Herod, His most ruthless and personally wicked enemy.

If so. where does it leave the Pope's opponents?

Yours faithfully. PAUL CRAWLEY. Ebbw Vale.

Gwent. NP23 5UN.




blog comments powered by Disqus