Page 6, 23rd October 1970

23rd October 1970
Page 6
Page 6, 23rd October 1970 — Scholarship as a foe of the obvious
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Aural Integrity

Page 11 from 25th July 2008

Yeats , Witnesses , And Bullfights By Freak

Page 3 from 11th June 1965

Word Perfect

Page 9 from 25th February 2000

Speech Day At Addison Road

Page 15 from 10th December 1937

Questions We Are Asked

Page 4 from 14th July 1961

Scholarship as a foe of the obvious

THIS is one of those schol

. arly works in which one cannot help feeling that "scholarship" has got in the way of the obvious. Professor Marxsen is attempting to explain, i.e., explain away the faith of the early Christians in the physical resurrection of Christ.

Sentences such as: "it would be dangerous to speak here of a 'historical event'. for the ideas which we now associate with this concept were then unknown" imply that the early Christians, not least those who were responsible for the Apostles Creed, could hardly distinguish between fact and fantasy. But some at least of the evidence of the Gospels suggests quite the contrary.

When Our Lord appeared in the upper room, at first "they thought they were seeing a ghost" and had to be convinced of his reality; similarly Thomas's doubt was overcome by physical evidence.

The truth is that the whole "form-critical" approach to the Gospels has become se fashionable in some quarters that many a twentieth-century exegete regards himself as more competent to decide about what really happened than were Our Lord's disciples and their successors.

Of course there are discrepancies of a minor sort in the various accounts of the first Easter Day. It would be surprising and indeed suspicious if there were not. Where human testimony is involved, especially in connection with a highly emotional occasion. every kind of inconsistency must be expected. To take a modern parallel. We know how difficult it has been to establish the whole truth about. the circumstances surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy. But even if we cannot establish precisely how or why President Kennedy was shot. this does not lessen our belief in the central fact. At one momcnt he was alive: the next he was mortally wounded.

The reverse is true of Christ. At one moment he was dead; the next he was alive. And that is what he had to convince his followers of.

Thomas Corbishley, S.J.




blog comments powered by Disqus