Page 4, 24th August 1979

24th August 1979
Page 4
Page 4, 24th August 1979 — Celibacy talks needed

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Organisations: Congress


Related articles

Letters To The Editor

Page 4 from 18th November 1988

Celibacy's Backers Damn Marriage

Page 4 from 28th September 1990

Church Should Ordain Married Men Says Priest

Page 2 from 3rd August 1979

In The Second Of His Articles On The Stresses Confronting

Page 5 from 24th January 1992

When Can We Have A Celibate Laity?

Page 4 from 10th August 1979

Celibacy talks needed

May 1, as one considering training for the celibate priesthood, welcome the views expressed by Fr. Michael Richards in the 'Clergy Review' and reported in your columns (August 3). That God gives to each person different graces, each according to his needs, is one of the basic beliefs of our faith. The gift of the graces needed by a man who remains celibate to better serve God and his fellow men is a very great one. The gift of the graces needed by a man called to minister to the needs of the community placed in his care is equally great. However, in view of the afore-mentioned belief, why should we expect God to give both these gifts to a man or neither? Does this not show considerable arrogance?

Obviously there would be difficulties to be overcome before ordination of married men could recommence. Wives would obviously have to be agreeable to the ordination of their spouses. It might be thought advisable to have both husband and wife under the authority of their bishop perhaps the women involved could join a new non-celibate order under the authority of the bishop and work like the parish sisters reported in the same issue of your paper. Should unmarried men be given the option of ordination without taking the vow of celibacy?

These and other problems need considering, but the scheme would at least reduce the terrible shortage of priests in this country. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of discussion at the National Pastoral Congress?

Name and address supplied

Readers are asked to keep their letters as short as possible. Full addresses will not be printed unless correspondents indicate otherwise. Letters may be cut at the Editor's discretion.

blog comments powered by Disqus