Page 6, 24th March 1950

24th March 1950
Page 6
Page 6, 24th March 1950 — POPE: A HUMAN BEING
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

People: Norman Ault

Share


Related articles

The Lyrical Poet In Ohn Paul Ii

Page 7 from 25th August 1995

Fairies, Magic And

Page 12 from 4th December 1959

People Talking About Themselves

Page 6 from 1st May 1970

Throwing In The Towel

Page 11 from 4th October 2002

The Conclave To Elect A New Pope Will Open On June 19

Page 13 from 7th June 1963

POPE: A HUMAN BEING

New Light on Pope. by Norman Ault. (Methuen. 30s.) APART' from the general consider

ations of the first chaper, this book is a series of closely-reasoned attempts to assign various minor poems to the Pope canon. From the pieces added to the canon and from the incidental reconsideration of the details of many of Pope's personal relationships, the author succeeds in toning down much of the harshness long associated with the name of Pope. All this is done with painstaking attention to first-hand sources, bibliographical, historical and biographical.

The argumentation is well balanced and sensible, though at times it may seem to resemble .a detective novel: " corroborated by the witness of

opportunity . . motive, occasion, and character." (p. 254.) Or one

may suffer minor irritation from the pardonable refrain; now for the first time. These are, however, definitely quite minor blemishes. There can he nothing but praise for the scholarly touch evident in every page, The book as a whole is a different matter: the details are there; the old picture of Pope the ogre is effectively riddled, but no clear new picture seems to emerge.

The hook remains a series of notes which never coalesce into a definite image, sometimes leaving unresolved contradictions such as Pope's utter absorption in his work placed beside the number of friends and the amount of fun he seems to have had with them. Even the light shed by the new poems, positive and delightful as it is, remains fragmentary.

One thing that seems to prevent a clear picture from emerging is the constant need Pope's biographers seem to feel to be apologising for

him. Their patronising and indignant pity for the poor little hunchback (who showed himself quite capable of fighting his own battles) would, I am sure, have infuriated Pope and provoked another epigram; that they should take so seriously the moral Mr. Pope would equally have made him chuckle. The time has come to stop confusing Pope with a Victorian moralist, and to look at him frankly and sympathetically as

a human being. That he will not suffer by it is amply shown by the details of this present work. The 'materials are here, the picture remains to be drawn.




blog comments powered by Disqus