Page 11, 24th March 2006

24th March 2006
Page 11
Page 11, 24th March 2006 — - Unintelligent design
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

A Design For Life

Page 11 from 17th March 2006

'there Is No Intellectual Merit In The Theory Of...

Page 8 from 17th February 2006

Stretching Credulity

Page 11 from 26th October 2007

A Child's Right To Confidentiality Another Side Of Luther My

Page 4 from 25th November 1983

Coventry Protest As The Delegate Speaks

Page 1 from 7th July 1967

- Unintelligent design

From Mr John Beaumont

SIR 1 am grateful to Mr Derham (Letter, March 17) for his kind remarks about my article (February 17) on I-4r Stanley Jaki. In response to Mr Derham's remarks on the theory of intelligent design. I would like to say that in my interview with Fr Jaki this topic could be given but very brief attention, as it was but one issue among several.

Fr Jaki goes into great detail on intelligent design in his pamphlet, Intelligent Design? (2006). There, he argues that the theory is not intelligent at all. It is a mixture of poor thinking about science, about philosophy, and about theology. Above all, intelligent design is a tacit surrender to fundamentalists who are aghast at the wholly unscientific character of the first chapter of Genesis.

Apart from this, promoters of the theory overlook the elementary fact that while forms can be measured, which is the chief task of exact science and is its touchstone of truth, design, which is intentionality above all, cannot be made the object of measurement.

Yours faithfully, JOHN BEAUMONT Low Bentham, N Yorks




blog comments powered by Disqus