Page 9, 25th April 2003

25th April 2003
Page 9
Page 9, 25th April 2003 — Tackling cloning
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Infamy Of Human Cloning

Page 9 from 4th April 2003

Government Accused Of Deceit Over Cloning

Page 1 from 27th April 2001

Pro-lifers Push For End To Destructive Experiments

Page 1 from 23rd November 2001

How 'independent' Is The Human Cloning Committee?

Page 4 from 5th March 1999

The Case Against Cloning On Al-jazeera

Page 7 from 7th December 2001

Tackling cloning

From Mr Francis Etheredge Sir, Mr B O'Connor (April 4) raises two points for our consideration: how to make people take notice of an issue, in this case the need to prevent human cloning; and secondly, how to get people to act as a body in opposition to it. While action stands to knowledge as building work to architectural plan, common action, action of the body, requires a widespread grasp of the issue in question: the beginning of personal life. It would seem, therefore, that a Catholic broadsheet is well placed to create the right "climate" of understanding, out of which good common action will arise.

Tackling the issue in a programmed way allows for some coverage of the different areas involved: Scripture; Magisterial teaching; traditional points of view in philosophy; the Fathers. And modern embryology. A key factor would be taking account of letters which help to identify areas of confusion, difficulty or ignorance; indeed, an editorial appeal in advance of such a series may well be of great assistance in the planning of it.

Let us hope our editors take up the task, already begun in part, of promoting an intelligible grasp of the beginning of personal life and the issues, which surround it.

Yours faithfully, FRANCIS ETHEREDGE Cheltenham, Gins




blog comments powered by Disqus