Page 5, 26th June 1970

26th June 1970
Page 5
Page 5, 26th June 1970 — TORIES AND THE CRUCIAL YEARS

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

The Crucial :years

Page 4 from 19th June 1970

Two's Cosy And Three's A Crowd Adding To Reform

Page 4 from 11th September 1987

British Politics Face Major Changes

Page 5 from 30th May 1986

Obsessed By New Black Magic

Page 3 from 5th June 1970

Taking Stock: The State Of The Parties

Page 5 from 25th October 1996


IN "The Crucial Years" in your opinion column (June 19) you failed to justify the claim that "the two main

parties insulted the electorate." It is quite true that

"Labour . have lost £900,000,000 of our assets ..." and that ". . . we stand at the foot of the international growth league tables". These facts are indisputable. The relevant statistics conclusively prove them.

But it is much less true that "Labour's recent problems . . . owed as much to world trends as to domestic management". Many labour supporters would

say this some may even believe itbut however clear it seems that this is not in fact the case, the techniques now available to us are inadequate to allow us to judge finally on the question.

On this issue, Sir, as on most, close examination makes makes it clear that the Conservatives, whatever their faults, are clearly to be preferred to Labour.

David J. Cashman Felton, Northumberland.

Dirty trick


formed the opinion that Mr. St. John-Stevas was highly intelligent. This week he lets himself down; or was he merely playing to the gallery'?

Really Norman. what connection has the Red Flag with the Labour Party? You know, if you are honest, that Communist thought is nearer to Tory opinions than to Labour ideas. And that Labour and Tory are more like-minded than Labour and Communist.

I imagine that you might be old enough to remember the Attlee government. Don't you realise that every new measure they introduced could have been taken from the Papal Encyclicals on the social Question: a matter of course, of similar thinking.

So your party won the election. And how? In the way they have won repeatedly on previous occasions: by a dirty trick. This time it was a blatant lie. told even at the risk of undermining the country's financial position, How can you support such a party?

H. M. Myers Godshill, 1.W.

Women in black

WHY the anachronism of women being received in audience by the Pope in black? This form of purdah is rather degrading.

Richard T. Wheeler London, WA.

blog comments powered by Disqus