Page 2, 27th November 1953

27th November 1953
Page 2
Page 2, 27th November 1953 — CATHOLIC I EVIDENCE

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

Dazzling Elizabethan Who Laughed At The Gallows

Page 7 from 4th December 1987

Fiery Mission For England's Diamond

Page 5 from 18th September 1987

I Catholic Evidence

Page 2 from 13th March 1953

The Lessons Of The Knottingley Affair

Page 7 from 7th April 2000

Feasting An Elizabethan Martyr

Page 7 from 29th November 1985


What is the refutation of this argument brought against Edmund Campion: "Whatever is in the sacrament Is void of sense or insensible. But Christ is not insensible. Ergo, Christ Is not in the sacrament"?

I N order to support this conclusion,

the statement, "Christ is not insensible," must mean "Christ, if present, must always be accessible to the senses-Christ cannot be present without being accessible to the senses." This statement contradicts both a common-sense conclusion from the divine omnipotence and the evidence of the Gospels concerning events after the Resurrection, which show Him as not bound by the limitations of matter,

blog comments powered by Disqus