Page 5, 28th March 1969

28th March 1969
Page 5
Page 5, 28th March 1969 — Criticism of Bishops o NE reads with dismay and Very deep
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Surrey

Share


Related articles

Broadening The Base Of The Parish Ministry

Page 4 from 25th January 1980

Cromer Not Isolated

Page 4 from 5th May 1978

Pipal Prinacy And Episcopal The Bishop In A Universal

Page 4 from 16th July 1999

2002 A Testing Year

Page 2 from 27th December 2002

Brentwood Survey On

Page 1 from 25th April 1969

Criticism of Bishops o NE reads with dismay and Very deep

concern the views of a handful of disgruntled priests, given in answer to a questionnaire on the election and appointment of bishops, published in your issue of March 14. Until now I am quite sure that thousands of good priests and members of the laity alike who, incidentally, have not been quizzed on the subject, will agree that the "Holy Spirit" has done a magnificent job and the bishops of this country, who come from all walks of life and diverse backgrounds, are a supreme example of selfless dedication, but above all have devoted

pastoral zeal for the souls of their flock.

Not many will agree with the remarks of Fr. Gerald Sutherland. and as to the sarcastic implications of Fr. Anthony Castle — in other words "jobs for the boys"— they are unworthy of mention.

Let those who criticise remember that along with the mitre and skull-cap goes also a crown of thorns. The burdens our bishops carry today are perhaps heavier than at any other time in the history of the Church. God bless and sustain them. Eileen Pearce Carshalton, Surrey.

The priests concerned were not disgruntled.—Editor.




blog comments powered by Disqus