Page 5, 2nd October 1970

2nd October 1970
Page 5
Page 5, 2nd October 1970 — Why we need renewal movement
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Hierarchy's Silence On Renewal Movement's Tactics

Page 5 from 25th September 1970

Renewal — In Or Out Of The Church?

Page 7 from 24th August 1979

Reply To Renewal Group From Very Worried Catholic

Page 5 from 9th October 1970

Subversion By Articulate

Page 10 from 9th January 1970

Action Call To Charismatics

Page 1 from 23rd June 1978

Why we need renewal movement

Keywords: Religion / Belief

MR. GEORGE P. BARNES

(Sept. 25) presumes or implies that which has not been proved when he criticises the Renewal Movement. He implies we are 'false prophets', 'attempting to lead men from God's teaching' that we talk of 'nebulous conscience'. Nor are we splitting hairs over infallibility; we are in fact attempting to understand better what this infallibility is and what it means for the Church. Certainly we differ from your correspondent if what he understands by Papal guidance is the handing over of one's conscience, intelligence and responsibility to the Pope. In this we are happy to be in the company of excellent theologians, competent and experienced bishops and large numbers of thoughtful lay people who are not necessarily formal members of Renewal. Questions about how the Holy Spirit works within the Christian community. what the role of the Papacy is, how far the local church embodies the experience of the whole Church, etc., etc.. all have yet to be worked out. I submit that the Renewal Movement is playing its part in this development of the Christian community, and that those who seek to replace reflection and dialogue with censorship and condemnation are hindering. not helping. the growth of the Mystical Body.

A. F. Brookes I FEEL I must reply to Mr.

George Barnes. who deplores the existence of the Catholic Renewal Movement and its "presumptuous" pamphlet on birth control. He says that what is required in marriage is self-control not birth control.

For Mr. Barnes, self-control may well prove a happy and satisfactory method of birth control. There are some who need not worry about self-control or birth control, as their mental and physical strength and financial position enables them to rear large families happily and satisfactorily. These people may have no need of the Catholic Renewal Movement. but that doesn't give them the right to condemn it. There must he many, who, if it had not been for the sympathy and understanding of the Movement. would have left the Church. So keep up the good work, C. R. M.!

Frances C. Eade (Mrs.) Scarborough, Yorks.




blog comments powered by Disqus