Page 8, 31st January 2003

31st January 2003
Page 8
Page 8, 31st January 2003 — T here is a constant temptation for Catholics to forget the

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Locations: Oxford


Related articles

Why The New Century Will Not Bring Vatican Iii

Page 6 from 7th January 2000

To Some He Was A Mountebank: To Others, A Prophet

Page 4 from 6th May 1955

Praying Outside The Box

Page 11 from 4th July 2003

We Will Look To The

Page 7 from 19th October 1962

Rush To Judgment

Page 5 from 29th August 2003

T here is a constant temptation for Catholics to forget the

present moment and look fondly for a golden age in which the Church enshrined everything they hold sacred. Traditionalists tend to look back to a pre-Vatican H golden age that never really existed: but it is rarely suggested that liberals of a certain type also look vainly to a golden age.

The difference is, they look to a golden age of the future. Both golden ages exist only in the imaginations of their authors. These pipe dreams are not harmless illusions or entertaining diversions, but harmful delusions that cause divisions.

There is a certain type of Catholic, for example, who longs for a third Vatican Council that picks up where Vatican H left off. They hope for another good Pope John, who will open the windows of the church and allow the fresh air of the liberal secular agenda to re-invigorate a moribund, legalistic and repressive church. But this is a pipe dream just as much as the traditionalist's 1950s Catholic fantasy, and when things don't turn out the way they want some of these Catholics become just as bitter as the traditionalists they so dislike.

Demographics indicate that whether there is a third Vatican Council or not, the church is in for a radical upheaval: the radicalism, however, will be very different from that envisioned by the ageing liberals of the second half of the twentieth century. When we look beyond the affluent countries of the North and West, we see that another Christian revolution, quite different from the one being called for in urbane Catholic European circles, is even now on the move..

The population centre of world Christendom has shifted, and we in the West have hardly taken notice. In 1900, Africa had just 10 million Christians out of a continental population of 107 million. This made up about 9 percent of the population. Today, the Christian total stands at 46 percent or 360 million. That percentage will continue to rise because Christian African countries have some of the world's most dramatic rates of population growth. At the same time, the advanced industrial countries are experiencing a disas-, trous drop in birth rate.

Within the next 25 years, the population of the world's Christians is expected to grow to 2.6 billion (making Christianity by far the world's largest faith). By 2025, 50 percent of the Christian population will be in Africa and Latin America, and another 17 percent will be in Asia.

Within fifty years only one-fifth of the world's Christians will be nonHispanic whites. The typical Christian will be a woman living in a Nigerian village or in a Brazilian shantytown. Already the annual baptism total for the Philippines is higher than the totals for Italy, France, Spain, and Poland combined. The number of Filipino Catholics could grow to 90 million by 2025, and perhaps to 130 million by 2050.

It is interesting that the future belongs to the young, hungry and zealous Christians of the South and East, but what is more interesting is their version of the Catholic faith. Those who wished for a golden age of liberal ideals will be cruelly disappointed because the Catholicism of the new majority tends to be rather orthodox. They believe the old, old story of a God who sends his son to the world to redeem the world from sin. They believe in a supernatural religion, the efficacy of the sacraments, and the power of the church. They prefer the older, sacramental, visually based devotions and are far

more respectful of the authority of priests and bishops. Hot topics like women's ordination, homosexual marriage and the democratisation of the church leave them cold. Their agenda is radical in a different way: they are hungry. And the Lord, as we know, has a habit of filling the hungry with good things while he sends the rich away empty. This implies a future conflict between the new majority and the old guard.

This conflict first flared up four years ago when the world's Anglican bishops gathered at Lambeth. Many of the bishops from America and Britain wanted to push through a more permissive stance on homosexuality, but the Asian and African bishops were having none of it. They pointed out that there are more Anglicans in Nigeria alone than in Britain and the USA combined.

They insisted on a conservative stance and infuriated the British and American bishops who were used to being in charge. When an American bishop accused the Africans of being ignorant fundamentalists, the African bishop replied that he, too, had a degree from Oxford and accused the American bishop of being patronising and racist.

In the Catholic Church the shift of power is evident in the College of Cardinals. When Pope John Paul II created new cardinals last year, eleven of the.forty-four were Latin American, two were Indian, and three African. The next time a papal election takes place, fifty-seven of the 135 cardinals eligible to vote will be from Southern nations. Within a few years, because of deaths of elderly cardinals, the third world electors will constitute a majority.

Will they have the courage to elect one of their number to the throne of Peter? The conservative, charismatic and energetic faith of the new majority in Catholicism is personified by Nigeria's Francis Cardinal Arinze. He is clever. articulate, and knowledgeable. Furthermore, in this age of increasing dialogue within world cultures and world religions he has served as the president of the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, which has given him invaluable experience in talking with Muslims, Hindus, Jews, and members of other faiths.

Arinze would be a natural leader for the new majority within Catholicism, but by liberal standards, he is rigidly conservative, and even repressive on matters such as academic freedom and the need for strict orthodoxy. In his theology as much as his social views, he is a loyal follower of Pope John Paul II.

What must be most annoying for Fr Folkmass and Sister Sandals is that they are the ones who have (rightfully) been most fervent in supporting the rise of Christians in the poor countries. They have been the ones most vocal in wishing for the voice of the faithful, to be heard. In a paradoxical way, the twenty first century will see the fruition of their dreams. The voice of the faithful will be heard. The majority within the church will take the reins of power, but the church the new majority brings to birth will look very different from the future golden age the liberals had envisioned.

blog comments powered by Disqus