Page 9, 31st January 2003

31st January 2003
Page 9
Page 9, 31st January 2003 — From Mr Vincent Whitehouse
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Second Vatican Council
Locations: London, Rome

Share


Related articles

The Society Of St Pius X Is In Schism With

Page 9 from 24th January 2003

The Vatican And The Society Of St Pius X

Page 7 from 7th September 2001

Lefebvrists Snub Pope's Call For Unity

Page 1 from 25th April 2008

The Sspx Has Held Steadfastly To Tradition As The...

Page 11 from 2nd May 2008

Like The Sspx, The Pope Is Worried By The Devastation Of...

Page 13 from 27th January 2012

From Mr Vincent Whitehouse

Sir, John Beaumont's letter re: the position of the SSPX 1 think risks inadequate attention given the flip-side of the matter.

The fact is, that even allowing the Society is in "de jure" schism (Count Neri Capponi, accredited to argue cases before Rome's highest juridical body, the Apostolic Signatura, with others, begged to differ), and not merely in an "irregular position" with the Holy See , it is incontrovertible that some national Episcopates are in "de facto" schism.

Witness the reluctance, or outright refusal, of almost entire hierarchies to faithfully implement Rome's directives regarding, for instance, catechetical instruction and sex-ed in schools; abuses and illicities in the liturgy; inadequate seminary formation; the toleration, amounting effectively to promotion, of widespread dissent not simply differences of opinion.

Strange things have happened in the contemporary, institutional Church. Catholics are not required to give carte blanche assent to anything that seems to contradict, depart from, or weaken the perennial Magisterium (teaching Church) with a much longer history than 40-odd years.

However one views it, the Second Vatican Council triggered if not actually initiated the Church's presently disturbed and disordered state; which in the '70s Paul V1 was himself lamenting as a "process of decomposition" and of "auto-destruction".

Is this what the SSPX (to which I do not adhere but with which I sympathise) attempts to counteract, in their refusal to entertain the preposterous notion that the Holy Ghost is renewing what manifestly is visibly ceasing to exist at least in the West?

Whether they labour under the odium of "de jure" schism, or not, seems to be somewhat academic, when there are presently far wider concerns clamouring for attention and remedy.

Yours faithfully, VINCENT WHITEHOUSE, London




blog comments powered by Disqus