Page 11, 3rd February 1939

3rd February 1939
Page 11
Page 11, 3rd February 1939 — —Says Government Party Paper

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Locations: Dublin, Belfast


Related articles

Letters To The Editor

Page 12 from 24th January 1936

Letters To The Editor

Page 2 from 15th August 1941

" How We Made Britain Support Us" Full Text Of Basque...

Page 12 from 3rd September 1937

Letters To The Editor

Page 3 from 3rd April 1936

The Irish Was Just Censor, Though Rigid,

Page 6 from 8th June 1945

—Says Government Party Paper

Western Prelates Advise People

66 Stay in Ireland," Press Takes

Up The Cry

Front Our Own Correspondent THROUGHOUT the North, the CATHOLIC HERALD a,ccount of the recent 1 bombings in England was quoted and read with admiration and gratit ode.

Many lvell-informed pepple • fear hitter developments. Thus, the Irish Netes (the Belfast daily) points out that the virtual establishment of a state of war in the Six Counties cannot bn justified by the explosions attributed to the I.R.A. as none — of them happened there, or in Ireland at all. What did happen in Belfast was the Sflerilegious destruction of a monument in a Catholic gra v ey a r d—but the " loyalists " who have repeatedly done this act, are not interned, nor even rebuked.

Would Postpone Unity

In Dublin. the Irish Press writes on the root of unrest, Partition, thus :

" in this paramount national question there must be unity of leadership and unity of effort. Any attempt at the use of violence by a section, with authority and without the approval of the people is bound to be ineffective and not ineffective merely.

" Worse than that, it will bring bitterness and confusion, create new divisions, may paralyse the national effort at a critical time, and nullify what that effort has hitherto achieved. It will not bring unity nearer, but may well postpone and place it beyond the limit of what can be achieved in our generation."


--SAYS A SENATOR THERE was a full-dress debate in the I Senate on Partition, led by Mr Frank MaaDermot, one of the Senators appointed on Mr de Valera's panel—hut not a supporter of Mr de Valera.

The Taoiseach nominates a number of members to represent interests that have passed over through election).

Senator MacDermot's plea was that the South ought to restore the British Crown and to modify its patriotic measures, such as the language revival, In order to ingratiate the Protestant Unionists; also, to adopt the British Flag and the British anthem. He contended that the teaching of history in the South " stoked up hatred against England."

Professor Alton, of T.C.D., and Senator Sir John Keane, Bart., spoke in the same strain, but Professor Magennis, of the National University, and Senator Scan O'Donovan, argued that Britain Inflicted Partition, supported it with arms and money, and could end it by withdrawing from our country—when it would be easy for artificially-sundered Irishmen to come to terms.

Direct Appeal

blog comments powered by Disqus