Page 4, 3rd July 1992

3rd July 1992
Page 4
Page 4, 3rd July 1992 — FR BILLY Fitzgerald, (Catholic Herald, June 19) seems to be
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Danger Of Following The Danes

Page 5 from 19th June 1992

Local Church The Key To Irish Knowing The English

Page 14 from 18th March 1988

Irish Bishop Clashes With Pro-life Group Over Treaty

Page 2 from 25th September 2009

Poll Quandry For Ireland's Bishops

Page 1 from 17th April 1992

Theology The Aunt Sally

Page 5 from 25th April 1969

FR BILLY Fitzgerald, (Catholic Herald, June 19) seems to be

advising the people of Ireland to vote "yes" to Maastricht and to ignore those pointing out the very real dangers of such a vote.

Well, I suppose it is all a bit irrelevant now since the Irish people have given a resounding "yes" to Maastricht, but I think Fr Fitzgerald should not be allowed to simply dismiss the genuine concerns of those of us who went out and voted "no" for very sound reasons.

I voted "no" because I don't want the Trish Constitution (which we in this country fought hard to secure) to be over-ridden by the European Court. I want to be able to exercise my democratic rights as an Irish citizen and not to be subject to laws and decisions made in the European Parliament. I want to belong to a sovereign, independent, democratic country accountable to its own people.

I am totally opposed to all forms of conscription and compulsory military service and I believe in our policy of nonalliance in military conflicts.

I am also deeply concerned about the possibility of abortion being forced upon our people against our wishes, as has happened with the recent Supreme Court decision which seems to allow abortion up to birth "in certain circumstances" that cold, formulated phrase.

By voting "yes" to Maastricht, one was also voting for the infamous Protocol which supports the position on abortion in Ireland after the Supreme Court's decision. In other words, one was actually voting "yes" to abortion.

Fr Fitzgerald does acknowledge that there is more to this whole matter than merely economic concerns. He writes "It would be wrong, of course, to suggest that the only applicable criteria are economic.

"There are certainly other important considerations. For instance, what are the implications for the traditional Irish policy of military neutrality? Could it be that we would have to subscribe to a policy of compulsory conscription into a future European Army?"

None of these deeply disturbing questions is answered by Fr Fitzgerald, yet he extols the virtues of Maastricht and advises us to vote "yes".

Maybe he does not consider such questions to be of vital importance to our people, but for those of us to who. they are of singular importance, the vote simply had to be "no".

Anthony Redmond Dublin




blog comments powered by Disqus