Page 8, 4th June 1937

4th June 1937
Page 8
Page 8, 4th June 1937 — Mr. Herbert Interprets Christ
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Lords Ebate On Marriage Bill

Page 9 from 2nd July 1937

Marriage And Euthanasia

Page 1 from 27th November 1936

Catholics Vote Both Ways In "marry A Foreigner And...

Page 1 from 3rd November 1944

The Marriage Bill A Manifesto From The Federation

Page 11 from 5th February 1937

9 The Cardinal's Letter P Raise God, First Round To Us...

Page 3 from 22nd February 1985

Mr. Herbert Interprets Christ

It was reasonable enough that the Government should provide an additional day for the third reading of Mr. Herbert's Marriage Bill in the House of Commons in view of the support the Bill had received there (though there have been other private Bills equally well-supported that have not received the same favour). The third reading debate was marked by some straightforward opposition from Catholic members who seem to have gathered courage as the Bill passed through its successive stages. Mr. Herbert's final speech was deplorable in the way it purported to interpret Christ to Christians. He claimed to be doing good to " the Church," and patronisingly

explained the " realism " of Christ. He added the assurance that there was not a single word in the Bill of which Christ would not approve.

Perhaps he might find an excuse in the fact that the Established Church of the country had just been acquiescing, through its representative assemblies, in the new version of Christ's teaching, and the Lower House of the Canterbury Convocation had on that very day decided to decide nothing for the present ahout the admission of remarried divorcees to its sacraments. Where the shepherd will give no guidance the sheep —even the wooliest—must have their say.




blog comments powered by Disqus