Page 10, 4th March 1977

4th March 1977
Page 10
Page 10, 4th March 1977 — Drowning porpoises
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: federal government
People: Richard Brown
Locations: San Diego

Share


Related articles

Earth And Ourselves

Page 3 from 7th March 1947

Meatless Fridays Don’t Have To Be Dull

Page 9 from 9th September 2011

Radio And Tv

Page 6 from 6th July 1962

In A Few Words

Page 4 from 24th September 1948

People And Places

Page 6 from 15th December 1978

Drowning porpoises

ECOLOGY is fine, but are porpoises more important than people? The question has been raised by Fr Richard Brown, Si, who has a parish which depends on the tuna fish industry.

Porpoises arc lovable marine mammals with some of the better human traits. Tuna are wide-tailed game fish which rich men in Hawaiian shirts catch from the hack of expensive motor boats while drinking cold beer.

But tuna are also caught by commercial fishermen for putting into hurried sandwiches. In the process of netting tuna, large numbers of porpoises get trapped in the bottom of the nets and get "drowned" because they cannot get Lip for air. Feologists fear that tuna fishermen may make the porpoise extinct.

The difficulty is that the federal government Wants to set the porpoise kill limit at 29,000 a year. The present limit is 58,000, and even that forces some fishermen to lose money. The death of the porpoises is the sad by-product, not the intention, of the fishing industry.

In San Diego. California, Father Brown of Our Lady of Guadalupe parish and other local pastors agree that their parishioners, of Spanish and Portuguese and Mexican origins, who catch and cope with the fish, will suffer grievously if the federal government insists on a limit of 29.000 to the animals killed to a year.

It is it problem of classic complexity and classical type in the moral courts of ecology.




blog comments powered by Disqus