Page 14, 5th December 2003

5th December 2003
Page 14
Page 14, 5th December 2003 — evotional prayer to Our Lady has always been the centrepiece

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

Ave, Ave, Ave Maria...

Page 7 from 8th February 2002

Mary And England's Conversion

Page 3 from 30th April 1948

Marian Shrine Could Become Focus Of Efforts To Unite...

Page 1 from 14th November 2003

Our Lady Of The 17th Parallel

Page 8 from 19th October 1962

A Pope Comes To Our Lady's Shrine At Lourdes

Page 5 from 12th August 1983

evotional prayer to Our Lady has always been the centrepiece

within Catholic piety. Among other things, those devotions have focused upon various Marian shrines, places where Mary allegedly appeared — for instance, Lourdes, Fatima and Guadalupe.

Karl Rahner, studying the phenomenon of' Marian apparitions, points out that they have one thing in common: in every case, Mary appears to a poor person. In every alleged apparition that has become accepted in popular devotion, the person Mary appears to is someone insignificant in the world's eyes. Mary has never, it seems, appeared to a Wall Street banker, a major civic or church leader,

nor even to a theologian. She seems to pick her audience with a special purpose in mind. What purpose? 'TO provide for them, the poor, something that the elite find elsewhere, namely a romantic vision of the faith by which to sustain themselves emotionally. That shouldn't surprise us. Mary, after all, gave us the Magnificat. She has always had a special relationship to the poor.

More recently, Marian devotion and devotional prayer in general have fallen on hard times, intellectually and theologically. Marian devotion is written off as non-essential to the faith or as a harmful distraction to it. Christ, the Word and the Eucharist, it is argued, are what's essential and the object of our intimacy is Jesus, not Mary. Moreover, what brings us together as Christians are the Word and Eucharist, not devotional prayer. Simply put, you shouldn't be substituting devotions for scripture or the Eucharist, nor saying the rosary in their place.

In essence. this critique is correct and was a needed corrective both at the time of the Reformation and at the time of the Second Vatican Council, Devotional life, and indeed all spiritual enthusiasm, too easily lose balance and, almost without exception, tend to lose their grip on the essentials. That's the danger inherent in all romance. Its very power to inflame the heart makes it a powerful narcotic that easily becomes an end in itself. Romance easily becomes unbridled, unglued, disorienting. It can change everything in 15 seconds.

Christ, the Word and the Eucharist are the essentials within our faith, but just as the main course in a meal doesn't necessarily make a complete meal, so the essentials of our faith don't necessarily satisfy all our faith needs, partic

The Las Ronald R

ularly in terms of the heart. What the devotional life adds to the essentials is precisely the romantic, emotional fire.

And that's more necessary than we think. Eric Mascall, a Protestant theologian. commenting on the place of the devotional within the more strictly liturgical and theological, suggests that the danger in opting for essentials alone is that "we end up on a diet of antiseptics, safe from food-poisoning, but in danger of suffering from malnutrition".

He's right. To give an example: today liturgists and theologians are almost universally opposed to having eulogies at funerals. The funeral liturgy, they contend, is complete of itself and the eulogy is an unneeded, inept distraction. They're right, in a way. The funeral • liturgy is complete of itself, theologically. But that doesn't mean it's complete humanly. It's not. The normal congregation at

a funeral isn't composed of people whose faith and emotional lives are so mature and integrated that the latter is fed and satisfied through the former. They want and need more than the essentials of faith and liturgy, particularly on that day. They want and need another kind of ritual, a devotional one that speaks more directly to them (however lengthy and in bad taste those eulogies sometimes are). The heart is part of the soul and needs its due. We don't live on essentials alone.

Classically, in terms of our prayer lives, this has been handled largely by devotions and, among devotions, the ones to Mary have had the privileged place. In Marian devotions the faith takes on a special relationship to the poor. In a manner of speaking, Maxim devotions are the mysticism of the poor. In relating to her, countless people without the benefit of professional training in theology or liturgy have wonderfully appropriated to themselves deep, essential truths about God's person, presence, compassion, and providence. They know and taste God's love through their relationship to Mary.

Many years ago, when I was an 18year-old novice, a very pious old priest gave us a talk. He shared how a young man had come to him complaining that he'd lost his faith. The old priest had simply told him: "You've lost your faith because you've lost your mother, Maty." Funny how among the hundreds of hours of talks and conferences that I heard during my novitiate year, that pious, overly simplistic, near-saccharine, theologically impoverished comment is about the only thing I still remember.

t Word olheiser

blog comments powered by Disqus