Page 9, 5th July 2002

5th July 2002
Page 9
Page 9, 5th July 2002 — A different light

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

Yours Faithfully, Graham Moorhouse [email protected]

Page 7 from 28th June 2002

A Light Undimmed

Page 7 from 21st June 2002

Where There's A Will

Page 9 from 14th June 2002

Letters To The Editor

Page 9 from 20th September 2002

T-shirts And Flip-flops Are No Bar To Receiving Holy...

Page 11 from 3rd June 2005

A different light

From Mr Hal St John Broadbent Sir, May I thank Fr Anthony Symondson for providing additional clarity to his review of Judith Middleton-Stewart's book Inward Purity and Outward Splendour : Death and Remembrance in the Deanery of Dunwich, Suffolk, 1370-1547 (Letter, June 28).

However, I still take issue with the assertion that Catholic England died when sanctuary lamps and votive lights were, as a consequence of Bishops'Book I injunctions(1537 and 1547/8), extinguished.

It is useful to recall sacramental theory in this context: the sign (sacramentum) and that which is signified (res sacraments) are the dual aspects of things sacramental. The sign, that is sanctuary lamps and votive lights, may have been removed in 1547/8 but the thing signified, that is respect for the deceased, could not be so easily legislated against.

My view is that the res sacramenti did not die as an outcome of Henrician reforms ; rather it found different ways of embodying itself in English society. Although the visible lamp may have been dimmed the heat that preceded the flame shone with a different, though nevertheless effective, light after the reformation.

Does this mean we now agree?

Yours faithfully, Hal St John Broadbent [email protected]

blog comments powered by Disqus