Page 5, 6th March 1964

6th March 1964
Page 5
Page 5, 6th March 1964 — Radziwill
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Police Seize 'power Of Mrs. Kennedy' Magazine

Page 2 from 17th November 1967

Effects Off Radziwill Case

Page 5 from 28th February 1964

Modern Inquisition

Page 6 from 28th May 1971

Portrait Of A Revolutionary

Page 5 from 13th March 1964

C 0 1 1 11e \t Radziwill Case: The Granting Of An...

Page 4 from 28th February 1964

Radziwill

Sir,—Father Wills' letter on "the Radziwill case" and the secrecy that surrounds the deliberations of the Rota prompts me to raise a question which has occured to more than one journalist.

One sympathises with priests and other parties who are questioned when a marriage annulment is given publicity: I knew the news-editor of a Catholic paper who literally staggered under the weight of the mail he received when a film actor's marriage was annulled (the paper was not the C.H.). But the question I wish to ask is: Who has a right to know the details of such cases, apart from the persons involved and those who administer the Church's law in these mat ters?

Marriage is (and ought to be) an intimate business between two people: it is a most private vocation. If a question of censure arises from it the censure surely is nobody'sbusiness, apart from the people involved and the authorities beforewhom they place their "ease" for judgment.

Has it accurecl to Father Wills that his suggestion—that the details of such cases be publicised — logically might lead to the installation of laud-speakers on confessionals? People are entitled, by right of being persons (princesses, by the way, are persons), to the decent privacy the Rota's method ensures.

W. J. Igoe, Loughton, Essex.




blog comments powered by Disqus