Page 2, 7th August 1953

7th August 1953
Page 2
Page 2, 7th August 1953 — A Film and a Hospital

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Locations: London


Related articles

Greene Film Offer Is Turned Down

Page 1 from 24th July 1953

Health Minister Gives First Place To Voluntary Care Of...

Page 7 from 21st May 1954

For Hospital

Page 7 from 18th November 1949

Cardinal Wins Fight To Save Hospital's Catholic Ethos

Page 1 from 30th November 2007

New Lease Of Life

Page 8 from 19th August 1983

A Film and a Hospital

SI11,-I sec from a report in a recent CATHOLIC HERALD that the Governors of the Hospital of St. John and Elizabeth. London, have turned down an offer of the proceeds for the London Premiere of the film of Graham Greene's "The Heart of the Matter." No official reason has been given by the Board of Governors, although certain Press reports have given rise to a number of rumours.

It seems a little strange that the Governors of this very worthy hospital should not consider making a statement regarding their refusal: it should he interesting. "The Heart of the Matter" is by one of our most eminent English Catholic authors of today. The question occurs to one : Are the Governors attempting to set themselves up as a board of literary critics or could it be that they judge Mr. Greene's very prolific and Catholic (in the religious and secular sense) outlook to be unworthy of their association?

The film was directed by Mr. George More O'Ferrall, one of the most distinguished Catholic film directors. whose reputation for sincerity has never been questioned. It is reported that Mr. O'Ferrall throughout the filming had the advice of two Catholic priests on doctrinal matters. What then can be the objection here'?

The subject of the film is a Catholic one, and may. as other Catholic films have done previously, arouse interest in those not of the faiththus doing valuable "missionary work."

It is reported that the governors have not even seen the film. What then was their reason? Could it be that they have suddenly found that they no longer need money-perhaps the State is to support it in future? Alas, I am lost for any other reason.

Otto Herschan.

blog comments powered by Disqus