Page 5, 7th August 1998

7th August 1998
Page 5
Page 5, 7th August 1998 — From Mr Graham Moorhouse
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Whatever Became Of Humanae Vitae?

Page 4 from 26th July 1974

Watershed In Our History Of Faith

Page 5 from 23rd July 1993

Beyond Doubt, Humanae Vitae Was Infallible

Page 13 from 4th June 2010

Ronald Rolheiser

Page 10 from 20th August 1993

Here I Am

Page 9 from 19th July 2002

From Mr Graham Moorhouse

Sir, Unlike Peter Cox (CH 31 July, 98), I hold Humanae Vitae to be among the pivotal documents of the Church this century. Without it, or something similar, I doubt that 1 would still be a Catholic.The dichotomy between that

holiness to which all Christians are called and making love to one's wife with a piece of rubber stretched over ones genitalia in order that one may dump the seed of life down the closet, is stark and blindingly obvious.

I was very active in the ecumenical movement in the early years following Vatican II. I became disillusioned for two reasons. Firstly, I grew aware that many people on the Catholic side were only Catholic in the tribal sense. In reality their faith was far closer to that of our Anglican brethren than to the faith of the Church.

Secondly, I found the spiritual pride of so many Catholics involved in the movement distasteful. They seem to assume that it is selfevident that they personally have a better insight into divine

revelation, the mind of God, the movement of the Spirit and of what should enliven Christian people than Sacred Scripture, the living tradition of the Church and the authentic Magisterium put together not to mention the whole spiritual heritage of the fathers, Doctors and Saints of the Church.

An ecumenical meeting in the immediate aftermath of Vatican II in my parish would have attracted a couple of hundred people, the majority of whom would have come from the Catholic side. I revised the scene a couple of weeks ago out of nostalgia.

The meeting was chaired jointly by a charming Anglican lady vicar and a Catholic priest. The priest dissented from the faith of the Church at every possible opportunity. There were 27 people present of which only six, including myself, were Catholics — those who were truly of the household of the faith had clearly voted with their feet a long time go. The evening seemed in some melancholy way to just about sum it all up.

Yours faithfully, GRAHAM MOORHOUSE. Havant




blog comments powered by Disqus