Page 6, 7th February 1975

7th February 1975
Page 6
Page 6, 7th February 1975 — Church's social teaching
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

The 'lonely Furrow' Of Fr Rodger Charles

Page 3 from 6th September 1974

Light On Church's Social Teaching

Page 3 from 14th June 1974

Cise To Be Absorbed Into Plater College

Page 3 from 18th May 1979

Charterhouse Chronicle

Page 8 from 13th December 1974

Need For Institute Of Social Ethics

Page 4 from 19th November 1971

Church's social teaching

Christian Ethics and the Problems of Society by Rodger Charles, SJ (Catholic institute of Social Ethics, £1.75 paperback)

Regular readers of the Catholic Herald will have learn ed something from its pages about the Catholic Institute of Social Ethics which was founded nearly three years ago by Fr Charles. Any Catholic — and in particular someone, like the reviewer, who is employed by the Welfare State — will welcome the initiative that the institute represents and the, promise of ,a concise textbook on the Church's social teaching.

Moreover Christian Ethics and the Problems of Society has many good qualities, not least of which is the way in which it is thoef Ohlidstoanryd, New Testaments, mediaeval dsteraulcintugriendtuinrntweritnhis

Christianity, the rise of modern society and the Church's response to it.

Nevertheless, I have three major objections to it. First, the tone of the book is brisk and school-bookish. This may make it useful in some teaching situations: I found it irritating. Secondly, it is inadequate in

the way it relates ethics to salvation and, more immediately, spirituality. The primary imperative of the Gospel is not, after all, one that is ethical in the normal sense, but "Repent for the Kingdom Of Heaven is at hand."

This is not merely a matter of dealing with one subject at a time, for this isolation of ethical questions introduced distortions of perspective even when objection cannot be made to statements taken singly.

Thirdly, while much of the historical discussion in the book is good in points of detail, some basic elements in the interpretation are open to question. Fr Charles is frank about what was wrong with mediaeval society, but tends to ascribe all that was good to Christianity.

Yet at a time when all values

were articulated in terms of Christianity (because it provided the only available language), it is difficult to disentangle what was specifically due to the Ch ur chha:Th This se evaluates eos M r t an at rxsi since

Fr Charles morally in terms of what has so far happened in Communist societies. There is no historical reason for refusing to ascribe their Virtues to the Communist Party when one ascribes the virtues of mediaeval Europe to the Church.

It disappointing that though there is a chapter entitled "The development . of the capitalist ethics" the special nature of that ethic is not delineated. While Marxism is seen as a quite separate and hostile ethical system, capitalism is condemned merely in terms of lack of moderation

in some things. PD




blog comments powered by Disqus