Page 10, 7th March 1958

7th March 1958
Page 10
Page 10, 7th March 1958 — AID. DEBATE BIASED?

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

Biased News Anticatholic News Agencies

Page 8 from 23rd December 1938

Pro-life Group Accuses Bbc Of Euthanasia Bias

Page 6 from 2nd June 2006

The Axis Courts The Vatican

Page 4 from 22nd April 1943

Here We Go Again

Page 11 from 1st November 2002

Conflict Likely On Sexual Ethics At Anglican Synod

Page 2 from 21st October 1977


AN interesting example of what looks suspiciously like antiCatholic bias in the national press of this country was shown in the reports that appeared on the Lords debate on A.I.D. last week. In that debate, Lord Pakenham was the only Catholic peer to speak; his speech, in which he demanded that AID. should be made illegal, was summarised in our leading article last week.

His contribution went unmentioned in the "News Chronicle", which used the debate as its lead story; similarly, neither the "Daily Mail" nor the "Daily Express" thought his views worth reporting. The "Daily Herald" gave him two short paragraphs, quoting him as "a Lebow peer", in which his demand for the suppression of A.I.D. was summarised.

Among the more serious national dailies. the "Manchester Guardian" came off best, giving an eminently reasonable summary of what he said. "The limes" did nearly as well, but omitted his explicit demand that A.I.D. should he made illegal; while the "Daily Telegraph", which devoted slightly more space to the debate as a whole than the "Daily Herald", gave only half as much space to his conclusion.

blog comments powered by Disqus