Page 5, 7th March 1969

7th March 1969
Page 5
Page 5, 7th March 1969 — TV CRITIC CALLED TO ORDER

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.



Related articles

Children And T.v. Smut

Page 5 from 24th April 1970

Pull Your Socks Up, Keating

Page 5 from 16th February 1968

Understatement Of Year On Strength Of Old Catholics

Page 5 from 31st July 1970

Tv Critic's Saddening Outburst

Page 5 from 17th July 1970

Radio And Tv

Page 6 from 6th July 1962


IT seems to me that your television critic, Mr. H. R. F. Keating, in his piece "A muffled voice still speaks" (February 21) is somewhat exceeding his brief by passing a value judgment on Cardinal Suenens' book which on his own admission he has not read. -First of all he gets the tide wrong. It is called "Co-responsibility in the Church." not "Co-responsibility." He then goes on to say: "But the book (which I have not read) was plainly no direct and easy work." This, of course, is a matter of opinion, hut surely one which should only be published by those who have read the book, Our own view is that it is a very direct and easy work, that the word co-responsibility is surely one with which CATHOLIC HERALD readers can be expected to cope without undue difficulty, and that prospective readers should not be put off in this way by this selfconfessedly uninformed criticism.

Paul Burns London, S.W. I.

The flu bug has unfortunately passed a "value judgment" on Mr. Keating, who is unable to reply this week to Mr. Burns. On the question of our television critic's "exceeding his brier', this is not so. I — not Mr. Burns — decide the brief of our contributors.—Editor.

blog comments powered by Disqus