Page 4, 8th March 1974

8th March 1974
Page 4
Page 4, 8th March 1974 — After Easter morning
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Jerusalem Church
People: Peter , Galilee, James
Locations: Jerusalem, Jesus, Antioch

Share


Related articles

The Paschal Sunrise

Page 6 from 8th February 1974

Saint Of The Week

Page 14 from 20th July 2007

Rolling Stone Drama

Page 5 from 5th April 1985

What Mary Means To Us Mary — The Feminine F'ace

Page 6 from 21st September 1979

The Scarlet Woman Of Scriptures

Page 6 from 8th March 1996

After Easter morning

Following Our Lord's appearances to Magdalene and the other women, what happened next?

If we had only the first two gospels, and the last chapter of the fourth, we might conclude (too hastily) that all further appearances took place in Galilee. If we only had St. Luke and his "Acts" we might think (just as rashly) that they all took place in Jerusalem.

If we look at the earliest written evidence of all (I Col-. 15.4-8, which takes us right back to the time of Saul's conversion, say six years after the Crucifixion) we are still left guessing, because this is not a time-list of the Appearances but a more or less official list of persons who claimed to have seen the Lord.

What seems fairly clear is that during the first 30 or 40 years (about a similar period as between now and V.E. Day 1945) the oral tradition of the Resurrection was passed on along two main streams, one through the disciples in Galilee and later in Antioch, and the other through disciples around Jerusalem itself. '

It is all rather guess-work, but did these two streams correspond roughly with the influence of the apostles Peter and James respectively? And also perhaps with the two different kinds of converts: on one hand the Greek-speaking "Gentilelovers" together with the Galilean enthusiasts who had marched with Jesus to Jerusalem, and on the other hand the stricter Judaizers, pharisees, priests and such like, who had joined up in the earliest years?

That there was tension between these two "parties" is clear from the Acts, and it was only resolved by the tragic dying away of the Jerusalem Church itself after the Seige of Jerusalem.

If we hear all this in mind we can perhaps glimpse some inkling of a solution to the greatest of all New Testament problems — why St. Luke quite deliberately omits all mention of Galilee in his accounts of the




blog comments powered by Disqus