Page 10, 9th September 1994

9th September 1994
Page 10
Page 10, 9th September 1994 — But where else can we go?
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Church of Christ

Share


Related articles

Pluralistic Church Acclaimed

Page 5 from 15th July 1988

Feminist Theologian Attacks Us Bishops

Page 2 from 4th May 1990

End 'impure' Images Of Women Plea

Page 3 from 22nd September 1989

Letters To The Editor

Page 6 from 15th July 1988

Bourgeois Blueprint For A Brave New Church

Page 6 from 26th September 1986

But where else can we go?

RONALD ROLHEISER

A RECENT ISSUE OF Sojourners magazine (July 1994), featured articles by two prominent Americ Catholics, Rosemary Radfo Ruether, a leading feminist, a Richard Rohr, the articulate yo Franciscan founder of the Cent r for Action and Contemplatio Both had been asked to respond tp this question: why do you stay in Church?

That, given the tensions with' Catholicism today, is a good que tion. Many people, especially tho who have been as critical of some df the things happening inside of th Church as Ruether and Rohr, hay left the Church, saying that the can no longer stay in such a flawe institution. Those participating this exodus cite a bevy of reason the Church's failure to practice justice within its own house, the Church's failure to afford women full equality in structure; recent sexual scandals among the clergy; a history that has always containe elements of injustice, racism, an hypocrisy. "Why stay?" they ask "surely this institution is not wha Christ intended to mediate grace!'

But Ruether and Rohr are no two persons who think this way Both make a strong option to sta with the Church, despite its faults and the reasons each gives for stay ing offer a valuable corrective for generation of Catholics that ca too easily lose its balance.

Ruether begins her response b giving a devastating critique of the Church. By the time she is finished listing all that is wrong with Roman Catholicism as an institution, you are left wondering as to what's still left standing. In the face of all of that, she asks: "Why stay?"

So why 'does she stay? Because she still sees grace present in all of this and she says that the proper response to the Church's faults is not to leave it, but to grow up. "I suspect that part of our dismay at recognising the fallibility of the Church is our reluctance to grow up, and the way in which certain kinds of ecclesial "spirituality" operate as spiritual infantilization. We arc shocked at clerical evils like the way children are shocked to discover that their parents are fallible. We can depart in sorrow look ing for another impeccable father (or mother), perhaps in an all-wise guru or a preacher of an inerrant Bible. Or we can grow up and become responsible for the Church of Christ. We can look steadily and without denial at the records of our corporate apostasy, not as the defeat of the gospel, but as the revelation of God's amazing power to deliver us from even the most monumental efforts to defeat God's grace."

Rohr takes a slightly different track, but is equally insightful. He, too, begins by admitting the Church's faults. He quotes Romano Guardini in his contention that "the Church has always been the cross that Christ is crucified on." He states that it is easy enough to create a good rationale for leaving the Church and adds: "In fact, with the information I have acquired, I might even hurry you out the door."

But Rohr stays with the Church and he urges others to do so. Why? Because for him it is the only institution that ultimately offers hope and it does this despite its flaws: Those of us who are of sincere will are, he asserts, "trying to preach good news to many disparate groups in our world: youth who want both inspiration and structure, feminists who must know that they have an essential truth, patriarchs who need to be challenged but not dismissed, the simple who need reassurance, the broken who don't need more words but a healing touch, the seekers who need both depth and patience, the alienated who both need and fear 'home', gays and lesbians who need acceptance before agenda..."

And, he adds "where else but in the great mystery of Church, the living Body of Christ, can all of these find common hope?" The Church has its faults but what have we got in a world that isn't working? Private choices? Ideology? Pluralism without purpose? In the end, we are before the Church like Peter was before Christ: "Where else can we go?"

But, valuable as these perspectives are, in the end, it is two words that provide for both Ruether and Rohr the sufficient reason for staying in the Church grace and forgiveness.t




blog comments powered by Disqus